Better Rating Systems Than the Goodreads Rating System

Much angst has been shed over the Goodreads rating system. It’s too simple! It’s too complex! It’s too vague! It’s too specific! Rioter Kelly wrote about why she stopped using the rating system altogether a few years ago, and now only writes meaningful reviews. Rioter Laura wrote about the curse of the 2-star rating and what all her 5-star rated books have in common. And those are just pieces published at Book Riot. The behemoth book-logging site affiliated with Amazon defines its 5-star rating system with the following criteria: 1 star: Did not like it 2 stars: It was okay 3 stars: Liked it 4 stars: Really liked it 5 stars: It was amazing But that is too broad! We need in-between ratings, Goodreads! Many users create their own shelves for ratings, including half-stars for those books that were between okay and liked, or between really liked and amazing. But then how does one decide whether to round that half star up or down for the official rating? It gets messy. I never minded the 5-star scale until seeing how seriously upset people get over not being able to add nuance to their ratings. I think it helps a reader really nail down their feelings by having to commit to a specific number, rather than halves. But I understand the need for variety in rating books. Today, we present to you… Alternates to the Goodreads Rating System The Thumbs System For when you need the brief simplicity that a 5-star scale cannot offer. Best used on the outdated business and self-help books your company forces you to read as a group.

Better Rating Systems Than the Goodreads Rating
System
Much angst has been shed over the Goodreads rating system. It’s too simple! It’s too complex! It’s too vague! It’s too specific! Rioter Kelly wrote about why she stopped using the rating system altogether a few years ago, and now only writes meaningful reviews. Rioter Laura wrote about the curse of the 2-star rating and what all her 5-star rated books have in common. And those are just pieces published at Book Riot. The behemoth book-logging site affiliated with Amazon defines its 5-star rating system with the following criteria: 1 star: Did not like it 2 stars: It was okay 3 stars: Liked it 4 stars: Really liked it 5 stars: It was amazing But that is too broad! We need in-between ratings, Goodreads! Many users create their own shelves for ratings, including half-stars for those books that were between okay and liked, or between really liked and amazing. But then how does one decide whether to round that half star up or down for the official rating? It gets messy. I never minded the 5-star scale until seeing how seriously upset people get over not being able to add nuance to their ratings. I think it helps a reader really nail down their feelings by having to commit to a specific number, rather than halves. But I understand the need for variety in rating books. Today, we present to you… Alternates to the Goodreads Rating System The Thumbs System For when you need the brief simplicity that a 5-star scale cannot offer. Best used on the outdated business and self-help books your company forces you to read as a group.